Trust Myths Exposed: Why Trusts Aren’t Businesses, Don’t Erase Taxes, and Won’t Protect You
- Dewayne Williams
- 1 day ago
- 8 min read

First things first: plain-English glossary
Trust: a legal relationship where a trustee holds property for beneficiaries under written rules in a trust agreement.
It is not a company; it is a set of duties and rights split between legal title (trustee) and beneficial use (beneficiaries).
The classic definition calls a trust a fiduciary relationship with respect to property. Uniform Law Commission
Fiduciary: someone legally required to act in another’s best interests. A trustee is a fiduciary.
Settlor / Grantor: the person who creates and funds the trust (terms are used interchangeably).
Trustee: the person or institution that holds legal title and manages property under the trust agreement, subject to fiduciary duties.
Beneficiary: the person(s) for whose benefit the trust exists; they hold equitable rights to the property.
Trust instrument / trust agreement: the written document that creates the trust and sets the rules.
Corpus / principal: the property owned by the trust.
Inter vivos: “during life” (a living trust). Testamentary: created by a will at death.
Grantor trust (tax): ignored for income tax—items show on the grantor’s Form 1040. Non-grantor trust (tax): a separate taxpayer filing Form 1041. IRS
Disregarded entity (tax): e.g., a single-member LLC the IRS ignores for tax classification, while state law still treats it as a real entity for ownership and liability. Legal Information Institute
Spendthrift clause: limits a beneficiary’s ability to transfer their interest and restricts most creditors from grabbing it.
Self-settled trust: the settlor is also a beneficiary; protection is limited and highly state-dependent.
Due-on-sale clause: a mortgage term that lets a lender call the loan if the borrower transfers the property without permission.
Encumbrance: a lien or other claim (e.g., a mortgage).
Membership interest: the ownership units of an LLC.
BOI (Beneficial Ownership Information): federal reporting about who owns or controls a company (Corporate Transparency Act, reported to FinCEN).
The core confusion (and why myths spread)
People often mash together three different things:
A trust (a relationship with duties),
A business entity (LLC/corporation formed under state law), and
A tax label (grantor trust, non-grantor trust, disregarded entity, S-corp, etc.).
Treating a relationship like a company, or treating a tax label like a lawsuit shield, produces advice that fails in underwriting and in court.
The safe-deposit-box analogy (kept simple)
Revocable (living) trust = a safe deposit box that can be opened or changed at any time. It’s great for avoiding probate if assets are titled into it. It is not a lawsuit shield: in modern codes based on the Uniform Trust Code, the assets of a revocable trust are subject to the settlor’s creditors during life (and to a degree after death if the probate estate is insufficient). Massachusetts Legislature
Irrevocable trust = a safe deposit box that generally can’t be reopened. When set up early and properly funded (not to dodge known debts), it can improve protection depending on state law, design, and timing.
Example: Think of two lunchboxes. One lunchbox (revocable) you can open anytime; bullies can grab food from it if they have a valid claim against you. The other lunchbox (irrevocable) is sealed by school rules; if you sealed it before any trouble started and followed the rules, it’s harder for bullies to get into it.
Houses, cars, and loans (what a trust can and cannot do)
Transferring encumbered property: “Encumbered” means the property has a legal claim or lien against it, such as a mortgage or car loan. The lender’s lien stays even if you move the title. Changing title without the lender’s approval can trigger the due-on-sale clause (which allows the lender to demand full repayment), unless a specific exception applies.
Key exception (estate-planning convenience, not asset protection): federal law—the Garn-St. Germain Act—protects transfers of an owner-occupied home into an inter vivos revocable trust (with continued occupancy and beneficiary status) from due-on-sale enforcement.
This eases titling for probate planning; it does not erase liens or create protection.
How underwriting actually works: Conventional agency rules explicitly allow title in a qualifying revocable living trust—
but underwriting still relies on the human borrower’s
income/credit and strict documentation.
See Fannie Mae B2-2-05 and B8-5-02; Freddie Mac §5103.5 and related exhibits. Fannie Mae Selling Guide+1Freddie Mac Guide
Example: A library card (the loan) is still in a person’s name. Putting the book on grandma’s shelf (titling to a trust) doesn’t make the library forget who borrowed it or who must return it.
“Let the trust make the payments”
A trust can only pay if it has money. A revocable grantor trust is ignored for income tax, so payments are effectively from the grantor. A non-grantor trust needs its own resources and still must satisfy lender documentation. Agency guides confirm:
even when property is titled in a trust, the borrower’s credit and income drive eligibility.
“Put the LLC into a trust” — what really happens
An LLC (Limited Liability Company) is created under state law, but it’s classified for federal tax based on IRS rules once you apply for an EIN (Employer Identification Number).
The core issue:
A single-member LLC is automatically a disregarded entity for federal income tax. This means the IRS ignores the LLC as a taxpayer. All income and expenses flow directly to the owner’s personal tax return.
People argue, “But the LLC still exists under state law.” That’s true for contracts and liability at the state level, but once you use a federal EIN, you can’t separate state and federal law. At the federal level, the IRS only sees the owner, not the LLC.
Why this matters:
Because the IRS disregards the LLC for taxes, the LLC itself can’t pay federal income tax. The owner must report and pay it.
When the LLC borrows money or enters contracts, lenders typically require the owner’s personal guarantee. That personal guarantee ties the owner directly to the LLC’s obligations.
This is why “putting the LLC into a trust” doesn’t do what people think. You can transfer the membership interest (your ownership stake) into a trust, but you can’t transfer away the federal reality that the IRS looks straight past the LLC and sees the individual owner.
👉 Bottom line: A trust can hold the ownership interest in a single-member LLC, but it cannot erase the fact that:
The LLC doesn’t exist as a separate taxpayer once a federal EIN is involved.
The owner must still report income on their personal return.
Lenders and creditors will still reach the individual through personal guarantees.
Trust taxes (myth vs. reality)
Trusts do not make taxes disappear.
Grantor-trust rules: income is treated as the grantor’s and reported on the grantor’s 1040.
Non-grantor trusts: separate taxpayers filing Form 1041 with compressed brackets unless income is distributed to beneficiaries (via K-1s). See current IRS Form 1041 Instructions. IRS
“Move it when trouble starts” (why courts unwind last-minute transfers)
Courts commonly reverse self-settled or last-minute “asset-protection” transfers as fraudulent:
Battley v. Mortensen (In re Mortensen) (Bankr. D. Alaska): transfer to an Alaska trust avoided as a fraudulent conveyance. US Courts Media
In re Huber, 493 B.R. 798 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2013): Alaska-law DAPT failed when Washington law applied; transfers deemed fraudulent and voidable. Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation
Example: Hiding a toy after breaking a classroom rule won’t save the toy when the teacher saw you do it. Timing matters.
Land trusts (privacy ≠ protection)
States like Florida and Illinois recognize land trusts by statute. These trusts can provide privacy and titling convenience,
but they do not erase lender liens or guarantee lawsuit protection.
Creditors can still pursue the beneficiary’s interest and the underlying collateral. Florida SenateIllinois General Assembly
The Legacy Builder model (C-corps, holding company, irrevocable trust)
A practical structure for owners who don’t want every loan or contract tied to personal credit:
Operating companies handle active business and risk.
A holding company (often a C-corporation) owns the operating companies and investment assets.
An irrevocable trust owns the holding company’s stock (governance, succession, distributions).
Enterprises raise capital at the corporate level rather than personal borrowing. For example, Berkshire Hathaway issues senior unsecured notes and other debt as a corporation, with terms disclosed in SEC filings and annual/quarterly reports—illustrating corporate, not personal, credit. SECBerkshire Hathaway
Example: Think of three buckets stacked: the bottom bucket (irrevocable trust) holds the middle bucket (holding company), which holds many small buckets (operating companies). Banks pour water (loans) into the company buckets based on the companies’ strength—not the person’s lunch money.
Quick checklist (before retitling anything)
Purpose: probate planning vs. governance vs. actual risk isolation.
State law: revocable-trust assets are typically reachable by the settlor’s creditors during life (UTC-style §505). Massachusetts Legislature
Liens & consents: get lender sign-off where required; understand due-on-sale rules and the limited living-trust exception. Legal Information Institute
Tax posture: grantor vs. non-grantor; Form 1041 if non-grantor. IRS
FAQs (short and simple)
Do trusts pay taxes?
Grantor trusts: taxed to the grantor. Non-grantor trusts: file Form 1041; can shift income to beneficiaries via K-1s. IRS
Can a trust “qualify for the loan” with no income?
Agency rules allow title in a revocable trust, but underwriting relies on the human borrower’s income/credit and specific trust documentation. Fannie Mae Selling Guide
Do land trusts make ownership invisible?
They can provide privacy and titling convenience, but statutes (e.g., Florida; Illinois) do not turn them into lawsuit force fields. Florida SenateIllinois General Assembly
Is the Legacy Builder (C-corps + holding company + irrevocable trust) approach legitimate?
Yes. The Legacy Builder is not only legitimate — it’s life-changing. It’s a proven corporate strategy that gives both asset protection and reduced tax liability, while being fully recognized at the state and federal level because everything is built with C-Corporations.
Here’s how each piece works together:
Operating Company → This is the “money-maker.” It handles the day-to-day business and generates revenue.
Parent Company → This serves as the corporate office. It provides oversight and shields the operating company by creating another layer of protection.
REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust) → This entity buys and holds all the real estate, keeping property separate from business operations and giving tax advantages.
Holding Company → This is the true vault. It owns the assets and the stock of the other corporations. This way, value is centralized but insulated.
Non-Profit → When structured correctly, it helps reduce overall taxes while also giving back and serving a community purpose.
Irrevocable Trust → Finally, the holding company’s stock can be placed in a trust to provide long-term succession planning, privacy, and protection.
Why it works:
Every C-Corporation is legally recognized at both state and federal levels, unlike LLCs that are disregarded for federal tax purposes.
The structure separates risk, income, and assets into different boxes — so one problem doesn’t destroy everything.
It mirrors what billionaires like John D. Rockefeller and Warren Buffett have used: own nothing personally, but control everything through companies and trusts.
👉 Simple takeaway: The Legacy Builder gives protection, reduces taxes, and creates a system where your corporations — not your personal credit or tax returns — drive your business forward.
Sources to link
Due-on-sale (living-trust exception): 12 U.S.C. §1701j-3 (Garn-St. Germain).
Fannie/Freddie—inter vivos revocable trusts: Fannie B2-2-05 and B8-5-02; Freddie §5103.5.
Revocable-trust creditor rule: e.g., Massachusetts UTC §505.
Grantor vs. non-grantor/1041: IRS Form 1041 Instructions.
LLC “disregarded” regs: 26 C.F.R. §301.7701-3.
Cases: In re Mortensen (Bankr. D. Alaska); In re Huber, 493 B.R. 798 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2013).
Land-trust statutes: Florida Stat. §689.071; Illinois 765 ILCS 405/ and 765 ILCS 420/.
Corporate-level financing example: Berkshire debt prospectus/filings.
Comments